The Clinical analysis of 105 patients with high-risk ovarian cancer undergoing prophylactic surgery

NI Li, WANG Ying-ying, ZHU Chen-chen, WEI Ying, ZHAO Ting-ting, ZHANG Tian-jiao, LI Min, ZHU Jing, SHEN Zhen, ZHOU Ying

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7) : 738-741.

PDF(882 KB)
PDF(882 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7) : 738-741. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025070115

The Clinical analysis of 105 patients with high-risk ovarian cancer undergoing prophylactic surgery

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and beneficiary populations of prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for patients at high risk of ovarian cancer with those of opportunistic salpingo-oophorectomy (OS) due to other gynecological diseases. Methods This retrospective study involved 105 patients who underwent prophylactic resection (bilateral appendixes) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, from March 2020 to September 2023. Baseline clinical information, including preoperative CA125 levels and imaging findings, postoperative pathology, and immunohistochemical results were collected and analyzed. Results Among the 25 patients who completed homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-related genetic testing, 20 carried pathogenic mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes. Twenty-four patients underwent SEE-FIM (Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbriated end) protocol sampling, and 4 were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). In contrast, none of the 80 patients who underwent OS due to other gynecologic conditions were diagnosed with malignancy. Conclusions Genetic counseling and timely RRSO are recommended for individuals carrying pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, as RRSO can effectively reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer. The timing of surgery will affect the final beneficiary populations

Key words

ovarian cancer / hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family history / risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Cite this article

Download Citations
NI Li , WANG Ying-ying , ZHU Chen-chen , et al . The Clinical analysis of 105 patients with high-risk ovarian cancer undergoing prophylactic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2025, 41(7): 738-741 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025070115

References

[1]
中国老年保健协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会. 卵巢癌早期筛查中国专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(2):204-211. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025020113.
[2]
Stroot IAS, Brouwer J, Bart J, et al. High-Grade Serous Carcinoma at Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Asymptomatic Carriers of BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants: Prevalence and Clinical Factors[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(14):2523-2535. DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.01237.
[3]
中国医院协会妇产医院分会妇科肿瘤专业学组. 预防性输卵管切除术的中国专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(8):826-831. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021080110.
[4]
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, Bulten J, et al. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(17):1879-1891. DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.02016.
[5]
Sessa C, Balmaña J, Bober SL, et al. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes:ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline[J]. Ann Oncol, 2023, 34(1):33-47. DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.004.
[6]
Kim M, Kim YH, Kim YB, et al. Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2018, 61(5):542-552. DOI:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.5.542.
[7]
Barker VE, Vlachodimitropoulou E, O'Brien P, et al. Combined bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and cesarean delivery in BRCA1/2 alteration carriers :a case series[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 142(6):1500-1503. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005423.
[8]
Terry MB, Daly MB, Phillips KA, et al. Risk-reducing oophorectomy and breast cancer risk across the spectrum of familial risk[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2019, 111(3):331-334. DOI:10.1093/jnci/djy182.
[9]
蒋清秀, 王海霞, 傅春玲, 等. 卵巢癌预防性手术4例报告并文献复习[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(3):381-384. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024030126.
[10]
卢淮武, 霍楚莹, 黄纯娴, 等. 《2025 NCCN卵巢癌包括输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌临床实践指南(第1版)》解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):436-444. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040113.
[11]
Steenbeek MP, Harmsen MG, Hoogerbrugge N, et al. Association of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy versus salpingo-oophorectomy with quality of life in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a nonrandomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(8):1203-1212. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1590.

Funding

Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Program(2022e07020013)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82172773)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82303588)
Anhui Provincial Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research Project (Natural Science Category)(2022AH051255)
Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars(2208085QH252)
Leading Medical Technology Introduction Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(2020LXJS-05)
PDF(882 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/