Exploration of the surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence based on integral theory

SUN Xiu-li

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 490-493.

PDF(857 KB)
PDF(857 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 490-493. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025050104

Exploration of the surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence based on integral theory

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The incidence rate of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is high and it seriously affects the quality of life of patients. The classic pathological mechanism theories are hammock theory and integral theory. The tension-free suspension of the mid urethra (MUS) developed based on the integral theory has become the gold standard procedure for stress urinary incontinence,and its effectiveness stems from the unique understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of SUI by the integral theory. In addition to MUS,there are new explorations in the treatment of SUI based on integral theory,and the clinical value still needs further verification.

Key words

stress urinary incontinence / integral theory / exploration of treatment

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Xiu-li. Exploration of the surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence based on integral theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2025, 41(5): 490-493 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025050104

References

[1]
Guralnick ML, Fritel X, Tarcan T, et al. ICS Educational Module:Cough stress test in the evaluation of female urinary incontinence:Introducing the ICS-Uniform Cough Stress Test[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2018, 37(5):1849-1855.
[2]
Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, et al. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms,overactive bladder,urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(7):1132-1138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09993.x.
[3]
Zhu L, Lang J, Liu C, et al. The epidemiological study of women with urinary incontinence and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence in China[J]. Menopause, 2009, 16(4):831-836. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181967b5d.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and associated risk factors of urinary incontinence (UI) in Chinese women.In the cross-sectional survey, 20,000 Chinese women 20 years or older were randomly selected and interviewed with modified Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaires to estimate population prevalence rates and identify potential risk factors.A total of 19,024 women were included in the analysis and 976 excluded; qualified rate is 95% (19,024/20,000). Of the Chinese women aged from 20 to 99 years (mean +/- SD, 45 +/- 16 y), the overall prevalence rate of UI was 30.9%. Estimates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence prevalence were 18.9%, 2.6%, and 9.4%, with a corresponding proportional distribution of 61%, 8%, and 31%, respectively. The prevalence of mixed urinary incontinence increased with aging, whereas the prevalence of SUI peaked in the group of women aged 50 years and that of urge urinary incontinence in the group of women aged 70 years. Only 25% of women have consulted doctors on this issue. Through multivariable logistic regression analysis, we identified age, vaginal delivery, multiparity, alcohol consumption, central obesity (women's waist circumference, >/=80 cm), constipation, chronic pelvic pain, history of respiratory disease, gynecological events, pelvic surgery, and perimenopause and postmenopause status as potential risk factors for SUI, among which age, vaginal delivery, and multiparity are three major risk factors.Our findings suggest that the prevalence of UI is high in China, with SUI as the most common subtype. Age, vaginal delivery, and others are risk factors for SUI.
[4]
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Waag A, et al. Incontinence[C]. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence/International Continence Society(ICI/ICS). Bristol,UK, 2017.
[5]
Bergstrom BS. The urethral hanging theory and how it relates to Enhorning’s theory and the integral theory[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(6):1175-1180. DOI:10.1007/s00192-019-04170-x.
The article discusses three theories of stress urinary incontinence, the urethral hanging theory, Enhörning’s theory, and the integral theory.
[6]
DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence:the hammock hypothesis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 170(6):1713-1720;discussion1720-1713. DOI:10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9.
[7]
DeLancey JO, Trowbridge ER, Miller JM, et al. Stress urinary incontinence:relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure[J]. J Urol, 2008, 179(6):2286-2290;discussion 2290. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.098.
Treatment strategies for stress incontinence are based on the concept that urethral mobility is the predominant causal factor with sphincter function a secondary contributor. To our knowledge the relative importance of these 2 factors has not been assessed in properly controlled studies.The Research on Stress Incontinence Etiology project is a case-control study that compared 103 women with stress incontinence and 108 asymptomatic controls in groups matched for age, race, parity and hysterectomy. Urethral closure pressure, urethral and pelvic organ support, levator ani muscle function and intravesical pressure were measured and analyzed using logistic regression and multivariable modeling.Mean +/- SD maximal urethral closure pressure was 42% lower in cases (40.8 +/- 17.1 vs 70.2 +/- 22.4 cm H(2)O, d = 1.47). Lesser effect sizes were seen for support parameters, including resting urethral axis and urethrovaginal support (d = 0.41 and 0.50, respectively). Other pelvic floor parameters, including genital hiatus size and urethral axis during muscle contraction (d = 0.60 and 0.58, respectively), differed but levator strength and levator defect status did not. Maximum cough pressure, which is an assessment of stress on the continence mechanism, was also different (d = 0.43). After adjusting for body mass index the maximal urethral closure pressure alone correctly classified 50% of cases. Adding the best predictors for urethrovaginal support and cough strength to the model added 11% of predictive ability.The finding that maximal urethral closure pressure and not urethral support is the factor most strongly associated with stress incontinence implies that improving urethral function may have therapeutic promise.
[8]
DeLancey JO, Hokanson JA. Reply to:the case against urethral failure is not a critical factor in female urinary incontinence. Now what? The integral theory system[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2022, 41(8):1934-1937. DOI:10.1002/nau.25036.
[9]
Petros PE, Ulmsten U. Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure I:muscle forces[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 1997, 8(2):74-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF02764822.
The aim of the study was to identify the striated muscle forces hypothesized to assist bladder neck opening and closure in females. Cadaveric dissection was used to identify the levator plate (LP), the anterior portion of pubococcygeus muscle (PCM), the longitudinal muscle of the anus (LMA), and their relation to the bladder, vagina and rectum. X-ray video recordings were made during coughing, straining, squeezing and micturition in a group of 20 incontinent patients and 4 controls, along with surface EMG, urethral pressure and digital palpation studies. During effort, urethral closure appeared to be activated by a forward muscle force corresponding to PCM, and bladder neck closure by backward muscle forces corresponding to LP and LMA. During micturition the PCM force appeared to relax, allowing LP and LMA to pull open the outflow tract. The data appear to support the hypothesis of specific directional muscle forces stretching the vagina to assist bladder neck opening and closure.
[10]
Petros P. The integral system[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2011, 64(3):110-119. DOI:10.5173/ceju.2011.03.art1.
The Integral System is a total care management system based on the Integral Theory which states 'prolapse and symptoms of urinary stress, urge, abnormal bowel & bladder emptying, and some forms of pelvic pain, mainly arise, for different reasons, from laxity in the vagina or its supporting ligaments, a result of altered connective tissue'.The organs are suspended by ligaments against which muscles contract to open or close the their outlet tubes, urethra and anus. These ligaments fall naturally into a three-zone zone classification, anterior, middle, and posterior.Damaged ligaments weaken the force of muscle contraction, causing prolapse and abnormal bladder and bowel symptoms.A pictorial diagnostic algorithm relates specific symptoms to damaged ligaments in each zone.In mild cases, new pelvic floor muscle exercises based on a squatting principle strengthen the natural closure muscles and their ligamentous insertions, thereby improving the symptoms predicted by the Theory. With more severe cases, polypropylene tapes applied through "keyhole" incision using special instruments reinforce the damaged ligaments, restoring structure and function. Problems that can be potentially addressed by application of the Integral SystemUrinary stress incontinenceUrinary urge incontinenceAbnormal bladder emptyingFacal incontinence and "obstructed evacuation" ("constipation")Pelvic pain, and some types of vulvodynia and interstitial cystitisOrgan prolapse.Organ prolapse and symptoms are related, and both are mainly caused by laxity in the four main suspensory ligaments and perineal body. Restoration of ligament/fascial length and tension is required to restore anatomy and function.
[11]
Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Murray C, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(6):593.e1-593.e8.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.043.
[12]
Mcguire EJ, Lytton B. Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence[J]. J Urol, 1978,119:82-84. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57390-5.
[13]
Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(21):2143-2155. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa070416.
[14]
Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions,pubovaginal slings,and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 72(4):567-591. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026.
[15]
Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. The tethered vagina syndrome,post surgical incontinence and I-plasty operation for cure[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl, 1990, 153:63-67. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0412.1990.tb08034.x
[16]
周莉, 殷米诺, 陆安伟. 尿道折叠术联合尿道中段耻骨悬吊术在压力性尿失禁治疗中的应用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(12):1205-1208. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021120109.
[17]
Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(22):2066-2076. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0912658.
[18]
全晓洁, 常小霞, 沈玮, 等. 电刺激联合生物反馈疗法对女性压力性尿失禁生活质量影响研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(10):1066-1069.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021100120.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC2411202)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82471661)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82171615)
PDF(857 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/