Peripartum and intrapartum glycemic management

PU Cai-xiu, ZHOU Wei

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 418-423.

PDF(902 KB)
PDF(902 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 418-423. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025040110

Peripartum and intrapartum glycemic management

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Glycemic management during the peripartum period and labor is critical for maternal and neonatal health,especially in cases of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Blood glucose fluctuations can lead to adverse outcomes such as neonatal hypoglycemia,intrapartum complications,and an increased rate of cesarean section. Therefore,individualized blood glucose monitoring and intervention strategies are the key to optimizing management. Insulin remains the primary intervention,and precise adjustments help maintain stable blood glucose levels and reduce perinatal risks. Future developments should focus on enhancing personalized management through new technologies,such as continuous blood glucose monitoring and artificial intelligence-based prediction models,while balancing intervention effectiveness with potential adverse effects to ensure better health outcomes for both mother and baby.

Key words

hyperglycemia in pregnancy / labor / insulin / blood glucose control

Cite this article

Download Citations
PU Cai-xiu , ZHOU Wei. Peripartum and intrapartum glycemic management[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2025, 41(4): 418-423 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025040110

References

[1]
Sweeting A, Hannah W, Backman H, et al. Epidemiology and management of gestational diabetes[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10448):175-192.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00825-0.
[2]
Dashora U, Levy N, Dhatariya K, et al. Managing hyperglycaemia during antenatal steroid administration,labour and birth in pregnant women with diabetes - an updated guideline from the Joint British Diabetes Society for Inpatient Care[J]. Diabet Med, 2022, 39(2):e14744.DOI:10.1111/dme.14744.
This article summarises the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care guidelines on the management of glycaemia in pregnant women with diabetes on obstetric wards and delivery units, Joint British Diabetes Societies (JBDS) for Inpatient Care Group, ABCD (Diabetes Care) Ltd. The updated guideline offers two approaches – the traditional approach with tight glycaemic targets (4.0–7.0 mmol/L) and an updated pragmatic approach (5.0–8.0 mmol/L) to reduce the risk of maternal hypoglycaemia whilst maintaining safe glycaemia. This is particularly relevant for women with type 1 diabetes who are increasingly using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) during pregnancy. All women with diabetes should have a documented delivery plan agreed during antenatal clinic appointments. Hyperglycaemia following steroid administration can be managed either by increasing basal and prandial insulin doses, typically by 50% to 80%, or by adding a variable rate of intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII). Glucose levels, either capillary blood glucose or CGM glucose levels, should be measured at least hourly from the onset of established labour, artificial rupture of membranes or admission for elective caesarean section. If intrapartum glucose levels are higher than 7.0 or 8.0 mmol/L on two consecutive occasions, VRIII is recommended. Hourly capillary blood glucose rather than CGM glucose measurements should be used to adjust VRIII. The recommended substrate fluid to be administered alongside a VRIII is 0.9% sodium chloride solution with 5% glucose and 0.15% potassium chloride (KCl) (20 mmol/L) or 0.3% KCl (40 mmol/L) at 50 ml/hr. Both the VRIII and CSII rates should be reduced by at least 50% after delivery.
[3]
李想, 盛晴, 吴天晨, 等. 早孕期空腹血糖及高危因素对单双胎妊娠期糖尿病及其他不良围产结局的影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(2):228-233.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025020116.
[4]
Mimouni F, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA, et al. Perinatal asphyxia in infants of insulin-dependent diabetic mothers[J]. J Pediatr, 1988, 113(2):345-353.DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80282-8.
[5]
Taylor R, Lee C, Kyne-Grzebalski D, et al. Clinical outcomes of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes(1)[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(4):537-541.DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01790-2.
To evaluate predictors of neonatal hypoglycemia and macrosomia in 107 consecutive pregnancies in type 1 diabetic women.We conducted a case record analysis of singleton type 1 diabetic pregnancies between January 1994 and January 1999 following institution of standardized management.The duration of diabetes in the women was 12.9 +/- 6.8 years, and 44 were primigravidas. The mean HbA1c throughout pregnancy was 7.2 +/- 0.8%. There was no relationship between neonatal blood glucose (checked before the second feed) and HbA1c at any point in pregnancy or mean pregnancy HbA1c (R = 0.20, P >.1). However, there was a negative correlation between neonatal blood glucose and maternal blood glucose during labor (R = -0.33, P <.001). When maternal blood glucose during labor was greater than 8 mM (144 mg/dL), neonatal blood glucose was usually less than 2.5 mM (mean 1.7 +/- 0.4 mM or 31 mg/dL). There was no relationship between mean HbA1c and birth weight (R = 0.02, P >.1) or between maximum insulin dose and birth weight (R = 0.09, P >.1). Fetal abdominal circumference measured by ultrasound at 34 weeks correlated strongly with birth weight (R = 0.72, P <.001).Neonatal hypoglycemia correlates with maternal hyperglycemia in labor, not with HbA1c during pregnancy. Macrosomia does not correlate with HbA1c during pregnancy.
[6]
Lepercq J, Abbou H, Agostini C, et al. A standardized protocol to achieve normoglycaemia during labour and delivery in women with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab, 2008, 34(1):33-37.DOI:10.1016/j.diabet.2007.08.003.
To evaluate a standardized protocol for maintaining near-normoglycaemia during labour and delivery in women with type 1 diabetes.Over a nine-year period (1997-2005), 229 pregnancies in 174 women with type 1 diabetes were delivered at one centre. The same regimen was used for the induction of labour (group 1) and in women admitted in spontaneous labour (group 2): 10% dextrose (80ml/h) intravenous was given along with short-acting insulin, starting at 1IU/h intravenous via an infusion pump. Capillary blood glucose (CBG) was determined hourly, and the insulin infusion rate was modified accordingly.Labour was induced in 85 cases (37%) and spontaneous in 23 cases (10%), and an elective C-section was performed in 121 cases (53%). Maternal glycaemia during labour was 6.1+/-1.6 (range: 3.9-9.2)mmol/l in group 1, and 6.9+/-2.0 (range: 4.7-12.0)mmol/l in group 2. Maternal glycaemia at delivery was 5.8+/-1.5 (range: 3.4-9.4) and 6.3+/-1.9 (range: 4.1-11.4)mmol/l in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Women who underwent an elective C-section were not included in the standardized protocol and had higher glycaemia at delivery 7.1+/-2.0 (range: 2.7-13.5)mmol/l. Neonatal hypoglycaemia occurred in 30 infants (13%), and was only associated with preterm delivery.Using a standardized simple protocol during labour, maternal glycaemia was maintained within a near-normal range in 80-85% of cases.
[7]
Yamamoto JM, Benham J, Mohammad K, et al. Intrapartum glycaemic control and neonatal hypoglycaemia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes:a systematic review[J]. Diabet Med, 2018, 35(2):173-183.DOI:10.1111/dme.13546.
To examine whether, in neonates of mothers with Type 1, Type 2 and gestational diabetes, in‐target intrapartum glycaemic control was associated with a lower risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia compared with out‐of‐target glycaemic control.
[8]
Yamamoto JM, Donovan LE, Mohammad K, et al. Severe neonatal hypoglycaemia and intrapartum glycaemic control in pregnancies complicated by type 1,type 2 and gestational diabetes[J]. Diabet Med, 2020, 37(1):138-146.DOI:10.1111/dme.14137.
[9]
张炜, 徐先明. 持续葡萄糖监测在妊娠期的使用[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2025, 28(1):57-63.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20240710-00514.
[10]
Murphy HR. 2020 NICE guideline update:Good news for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and past or current gestational diabetes[J]. Diabet Med, 2021, 38(6):e14576.DOI:10.1111/dme.14576.
[11]
Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT):a multicentre international randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10110):2347-2359.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5.
[12]
中国研究型医院学会糖尿病学专业委员会. 中国妊娠期糖尿病母儿共同管理指南(2024版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2024, 16(12):1324-1345. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20240918-00561.
[13]
魏玉梅, 杨慧霞. 妊娠期高血糖的诊断及管理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(2):117-120.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2020020107.
妊娠期高血糖(HIP)母儿不良结局明显增加,不仅近期并发症增加,远期发展为糖尿病风险也明显增加。妊娠期高血糖包括孕前糖尿病合并妊娠(PGDM)和妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)。我国二孩政策全面放开后,高危人群比例增加,HIP孕妇比例将进一步增加。对于妊娠期高血糖的筛查、诊断、管理策略及母儿的远期随访等问题均应引起关注。
[14]
Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis,management,and care[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015,131 Suppl 3:S173-211.DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30033-3.
[15]
Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M. Guideline No. 393-Diabetes in Pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019, 41(12):1814-1825.DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.008.
[16]
Jinjing W, Kang C, Xufei L, et al. Chinese clinical practice guidelines for perioperative blood glucose management[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2021, 37(7):e3439.DOI:10.1002/dmrr.3439.
With the increased incidence of diabetes, the number of diabetic patients who require surgical treatment is also increasing. Unfortunately, practices in this area lack standardisation. The purpose of this multidisciplinary, evidence‐based guidelines for perioperative blood glucose management is to provide a comprehensive set of recommendations for clinicians treating diabetes with different types of surgery. The intended audience comprises Chinese endocrinologists, surgeons, anaesthetists, clinical pharmacists, nurses and professionals involved in perioperative blood glucose management. The guidelines were formulated as follows. First, a multidisciplinary expert group was established to identify and formulate key research questions on topics of priority according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes (PICO) process. We conducted a meta‐analysis of available studies using Review Manager version 5.3, as appropriate. We pooled crude estimates as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals using a random‐effects model, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods to assess the quality of the retrieved evidence. Finally, 32 recommendations were gathered that covered 11 fields—management and coordination, endocrinologists' consultation, diabetes diagnosis, surgery timing and anaesthesia method, blood glucose target values and monitoring frequency, hypoglycaemia treatment, oral administration of blood glucose lowering drugs, use of insulin, enteral and parenteral nutritional, postoperative treatment and medication and education and training. Twenty‐five systematic reviews and meta‐analyses were conducted for these guidelines to address the PICO questions. These guidelines are intended to improve perioperative blood glucose management and help doctors in specifying medical diagnosis and treatment, and will be implemented / disseminated extensively in China.
[17]
孔北华, 马丁, 段涛. 妇产科学)[M]. 10版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2024:112.
[18]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会, 中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会. 妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第一部分][J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(1):3-12.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210917-00528.
[19]
刘国成, 蔺莉. 产科快速康复临床路径专家共识[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2020, 29(8):561-567.DOI:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2020.08.001.
[20]
Hamel MS, Kanno LM, Has P, et al. Intrapartum Glucose Management in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133(6):1171-1177.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003257.
To assess the effect of tight compared with liberalized intrapartum maternal glucose management on neonatal hypoglycemia risk in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).This was a randomized controlled trial of women with singleton gestations and GDM attempting vaginal delivery. After written informed consent, women were randomly allocated to one of two intrapartum maternal glucose management protocols: tight control (glucose measurements hourly and treatment for maternal glucose levels lower than 60 mg/dL or greater than 100 mg/dL) or liberalized control (glucose measurements every 4 hours and treatment for maternal glucose levels lower than 60 mg/dL or greater than 120 mg/dL). The primary outcome was the first neonatal blood glucose level; a total sample size of 74 was necessary to have 80% power to detect a mean difference of 10 mg/dL between groups. Secondary outcomes included neonatal blood glucose concentrations within the first 24 hours of life, number of glucose treatments (intravenous or oral) received to treat neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.From February 2016 to April 2018, 76 women were randomized (38 in each group), and all were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable for all relevant obstetric variables; mean gestational age was 39 weeks in both groups. Antepartum, two thirds of women in each group were treated medically (almost exclusively with insulin). The primary outcome was similar between the tight and liberalized control groups: 53 mg/dL vs 58 mg/dL, mean difference -4.18, 95% CI -12.66 to 4.29. However, mean neonatal glucose level within the first 24 hours of life was lower in the tight control group: 54 mg/dL vs 58 mg/dL, mean difference -3.39, 95% CI -7.07 to 0.29. Other secondary outcomes were similar between groups.A protocol aimed at tight maternal glucose management in labor compared with liberalized management for women with GDM did not result in better initial neonatal glucose concentrations and was associated with lower mean neonatal blood glucose levels in the first 24 hours of life. This study supports raising the upper threshold for intrapartum maternal glucose and decreasing the frequency of intrapartum glucose assessment for women with GDM.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02596932.
[21]
Queensland Clinical Guidelines. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Guideline No. MN21.33-V6-R26. Queensland Health. 2022. Available from: http://health.qld.gov.au/qcg.
[22]
Dude AM, Niznik CM, Szmuilowicz ED, et al. Management of Diabetes in the Intrapartum and Postpartum Patient[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2018, 35(11):1119-1126.DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1629903.
Achieving maternal euglycemia in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus is critical to decreasing the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia, as maternal blood glucose levels around the time of delivery are directly related to the risk of hypoglycemia in the neonate. Many institutions use continuous insulin and glucose infusions during the intrapartum period, although practices are widely variable. At Northwestern Memorial Hospital, the "Management of the Perinatal Patient with Diabetes" policy and protocol was developed to improve consistency of management while also allowing individualization appropriate for the patient's specific diabetic needs. This protocol introduced standardized algorithms based on maternal insulin requirements to drive real-time maternal glucose control during labor as well as provided guidelines for postpartum glycemic control. This manuscript describes the development and implementation of this protocol to encourage other institutions to adopt a standardized protocol that allows highly individualized intrapartum care to women with diabetes.Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
[23]
Dinglas C, Muscat J, Adams T, et al. Software-guided insulin dosing improves intrapartum glycemic management in women with diabetes mellitus[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(2):191 e191-191 e196.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.003.
[24]
Dude AM, Niznik C, Peaceman AM, et al. Evaluation of an Intrapartum Insulin Regimen for Women With Diabetes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 136(2):411-416.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003940.
To examine whether an insulin protocol for intrapartum glucose control among parturients with diabetes was associated with improved outcomes.This is a retrospective cohort study of women with pregestational or gestational diabetes delivering a liveborn neonate at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Before 2011, women with diabetes were given intravenous (IV) insulin or glucose during labor at the discretion of the on-call endocrinologist. In 2011, a standardized protocol was designed to titrate insulin and glucose infusions. Outcomes were compared between two time periods: January 2005-December 2010 (before implementation) and January 2012-December 2017 (after implementation) with 2011 excluded to account for a phase-in period. Maternal outcomes included intrapartum hyperglycemia (blood glucose greater than 125 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 60 mg/dL). Neonatal outcomes included hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL), intensive care admission, and IV dextrose therapy. t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and χ tests were used for bivariable analyses. Linear and logistic multivariable regression were used to account for confounding factors.Of 3,689 women, 928 (25.2%) delivered before 2011. After protocol implementation, frequencies of both maternal intrapartum hyperglycemia (51.3% vs 37.9%) and hypoglycemia decreased (6.1% vs 2.5%), both P<.001; respective adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.77 and 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78. The frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia, however, increased (36.6% vs 49.2%, P<.001; aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.45-2.07). Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and need for IV dextrose therapy were similar across time periods.A formal protocol to manage insulin and glucose infusions for parturients with diabetes was associated with improved intrapartum maternal glucose control, but an increased frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia.
[25]
George S, Dale J, Stanisstreet D. A guideline for the use of variable rate intravenous insulin infusion in medical inpatients[J]. Diabet Med, 2015(6):706-713.DOI:10.1111/dme.12756.
[26]
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024[J]. Diabetes Care, 2024, 47(Suppl 1):S282-S294.DOI:10.2337/dc24-S015.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.
[27]
漆洪波, 石琪. 更新产程管理理念,改进分娩体验[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(2):129-132.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024020101.
[28]
范岩峰, 钟红秀, 李丽榕, 等. 营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇孕期体重增长和血脂代谢水平及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(9):929-933.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2022090114.
[29]
何秀玲, 温济英, 邹文霞, 等. 产程饮食管理对妊娠糖尿病产妇母儿分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(3):364-368.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.03.009.
[30]
Fresa R, Visalli N, Di Blasi V, et al. Experiences of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes during delivery from four Italian centers: a retrospective observational study[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2013, 15(4):328-334.DOI:10.1089/dia.2012.0260.
[31]
Wilkie GL, Delpapa E, Leftwich HK. Intrapartum continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs intravenous insulin infusion among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 229(6):680.e681-e688.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.003.
[32]
Waters TP, Kim SY, Sharma AJ, et al. Longitudinal changes in glucose metabolism in women with gestational diabetes,from late pregnancy to the postpartum period[J]. Diabetologia, 2020, 63(2):385-394.DOI:10.1007/s00125-019-05051-0.
[33]
Achong N, Duncan EL, McIntyre HD, et al. Peripartum management of glycemia in women with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2014, 37(2):364-371.DOI:10.2337/dc13-1348.
We aimed to 1) describe the peripartum management of type 1 diabetes at an Australian teaching hospital and 2) discuss factors influencing the apparent transient insulin independence postpartum.We conducted a retrospective review of women with type 1 diabetes delivering singleton pregnancies from 2005 to 2010. Information was collected regarding demographics, medical history, peripartum management and outcome, and breast-feeding. To detect a difference in time to first postpartum blood glucose level (BGL) >8 mmol/L between women with an early (<4 h) and late (>12 h) requirement for insulin postpartum, with a power of 80% and a type 1 error of 0.05, at least 24 patients were required.An intravenous insulin infusion was commenced in almost 95% of women. Univariate analysis showed that increased BMI at term, lower creatinine at term, longer duration from last dose of long- or intermediate-acting insulin, and discontinuation of an insulin infusion postpartum were associated with a shorter time to first requirement of insulin postpartum (P = 0.005, 0.026, 0.026, and <0.001, respectively). There was a correlation between higher doses of insulin commenced postpartum and number of out-of-range BGLs (r[36] = 0.358, P = 0.030) and hypoglycemia (r[36] = 0.434, P = 0.007). Almost 60% had at least one BGL <3.5 mmol/L between delivery and discharge.Changes in the pharmacodynamic profile of insulin may contribute to the transient insulin independence sometimes observed postpartum in type 1 diabetes. A dose of 50-60% of the prepregnancy insulin requirement resulted in the lowest rate of hypoglycemia and glucose excursions. These results require validation in a larger, prospective study.
[34]
余昕烊, 吴侠霏, 漆洪波. 昆士兰卫生组织《妊娠期糖尿病指南(2021年版)》要点解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(9):933-936.
[35]
邹卉, 郭元芳. 多组学技术在新生儿遗传代谢疾病筛查中的应用[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2023, 38(7):506-510.DOI:10.19538/j.ek2023070605.
[36]
尤凤妍, 孙妍, 徐海. 儿童和青少年1型糖尿病胰岛细胞功能评估方法[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2024, 39(11):873-876.DOI:10.19538/j.ek2024110614.
[37]
许芊芊, 杨慧霞. 孕前糖尿病合并妊娠临床管理新进展[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2020, 23(2):114-120.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021090113.
[38]
Garcia-Patterson A, Gich I, Amini SB, et al. Insulin requirements throughout pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: three changes of direction[J]. Diabetologia, 2010, 53(3):446-451.DOI:10.1007/s00125-009-1633-z.

Funding

Key Project of the Special Program for Technological Innovation and Application Development of Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau(CSTB2022TIAD-KPX0166)
PDF(902 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/