宫腔镜术中严重气体栓塞相关因素研究
Clinical research on related factors of serious gas embolism in hysteroscopy surgery.
目的 探讨宫腔镜手术中发生循环气体栓塞(气栓)的相关因素及症状出现的原因。方法 观察郑州大学人民医院2010-08-04至2010-12-31收治的34例宫腔镜手术患者,采用超声多普勒监测循环中气栓的情况,并进行分级;分析不同级别气栓、手术时间、灌注量、单双极电切与临床症状或体征出现的关系。结果 34例患者中发现循环气栓20例,出现症状6例,无气栓者无症状出现;Ⅱ级气栓5例,出现症状2例,Ⅲ级气栓6例,出现症状4例,症状出现与气栓级别呈正相关;手术时间>30 min者26例,气栓18例,出现症状6例,气栓级别及临床症状率均显著增加;灌注量>3000 mL 20例,气栓15例,出现症状4例,随灌注量增多,气栓及临床症状出现例数明显增多,差异有统计学意义;单极电切20例,发现气栓12例,出现症状5例;双极14例,发现气栓8例,出现症状1例,发现气栓及出现症状差异无统计学意义。结论 宫腔镜手术临床症状与气栓关系密切,低级别气栓对机体无严重损伤。气栓分级可以预测严重并发症的出现,气栓的等级与临床症状的出现有相关性。
Abstract: Objective To explore factors related to circulating gas embolism occurrence and causes of symptoms during hysteroscopic surgery. Methods In the 34 cases undergoing hysteroscopic surgery,conditions of circulating gas embolism were monitored and leveled by the Doppler. Results Twenty patients of all 34 patients had gas embolism, and 6 patients had symptoms; 2 out of 5 were symptomatic in grade Ⅱ gas embolism group, while 4 out of 6 in grade Ⅲ. Symptoms were positively correlated with levels of gas embolism. In 26 cases whose operation time was over 30 minutes, gas embolism occurred in 18 patients, and 6 patients had symptoms,which showed increasing probability of gas embolism levels and clinical symptoms. No gas embolism occurred when the perfusion volume was<2000 mL,while 5 out of 10 cases with perfusion volume 2000 to 3000ml and 15 out of 20 with over 3000ml developed gas embolism, 1 and 5 cases had symptoms respectively. The incidence of gas embolism and occurrence of clinical symptoms increased significantly with the perfusion volume. Conclusions A close relationship between the occurrence of clinical symptoms and gas embolism is observed. Low-degree gas embolism has no serious damage. The degree of gas embolism can be used as an option to predict the occurrence of serious complications.The level of gas embolism is related to the clinical symproms.
hysteroscopic surgery / gas embolism / clinical symptoms;degree of embolism
[1] Dyrbye BA, Overdijk LE, van Kesteren PJ, et al. Gas embolism during hysteroscopic surgery using bipolar or monopolar diathermia: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2012,207:271.e1-6.
[2] Rademaker BMP, Groenman FA, van der Wouw PA, et al. Paradoxical gas embolism by transpulmonary passage of venous emboli during hysteroscopic surgery: a case report and discussion[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101: 230-233.
[3] Imasogie N, Crago R, Leyland NA , et al. Probable gas embolism during operative hysteroscopy caused byproducts of combustion[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2002, 49 (10): 1044-1047.
[4] 许运巧,张菊新.超声心动图联合呼气末CO2分压监测预防宫腔镜术中空气栓塞的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2013,48(11):828-832.
[5] Rademaker BM, van Kesteren PJ,de HaanP, et al. How safe is the intravasation limit in hysteroscopic surgery? [J]. Minimally Invasive Gynecology , 2011, 18:355-361.
[6] 赵素贞,刘胜群,刘月强,等.宫腔镜手术患者发生空气栓子的诱因[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2012,32(4):404-406.
[7] Farrugia M, Hussain SY, Perett D. Particulate matter generated during monopolar and bipolar hysteroscopic human uterine tissue vaporization[J]. Minimally Invasive Gynecol,2009,16:458-464.
[8] Munro MG, Brill AI, Ryan T,et al. Electrosurgery-induced generation of gases: comparison of in vitro rates of production using bipolar and monopolar electrodes[J]. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2003,10:252-259.
(2014-04-15收稿 2014-06-28修回)
河南省医科院科技攻关项目(201203136、201203132)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |