卵巢癌高风险患者行预防性手术105例临床资料分析

倪丽, 王莹莹, 朱晨辰, 卫莹, 赵婷婷, 张天骄, 李敏, 朱靖, 申震, 周颖

中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7) : 738-741.

PDF(882 KB)
PDF(882 KB)
中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7) : 738-741. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025070115
论著

卵巢癌高风险患者行预防性手术105例临床资料分析

作者信息 +

The Clinical analysis of 105 patients with high-risk ovarian cancer undergoing prophylactic surgery

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨卵巢癌高风险人群行预防性降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)与因妇科其他疾病行机会性输卵管卵巢切除术(OS)的临床结局和获益人群。方法 回顾性分析2020年3月至2023年9月就诊于中国科学技术大学附属第一医院妇产科105例行预防性切除术(双附件)患者基本临床信息,包括治疗前糖类抗原(CA)125与影像学检查情况、术后病理与免疫组化等信息。结果 25例卵巢癌高风险人群完成同源重组修复缺陷(HRD)相关基因检测,其中20例携带同源重组修复(HRR)通路致病突变,最终24例患者行SEE-FIM方案取材,4例患者确诊为卵巢癌。因妇科其他疾病行OS的80例卵巢癌高风险人群中无确诊者。结论 推荐携带BRCA1/2致病突变人群尽早进行遗传咨询,选择恰当时机行RRSO可有效降低卵巢癌发病,手术时机的选择将影响最终获益人群。

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and beneficiary populations of prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for patients at high risk of ovarian cancer with those of opportunistic salpingo-oophorectomy (OS) due to other gynecological diseases. Methods This retrospective study involved 105 patients who underwent prophylactic resection (bilateral appendixes) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, from March 2020 to September 2023. Baseline clinical information, including preoperative CA125 levels and imaging findings, postoperative pathology, and immunohistochemical results were collected and analyzed. Results Among the 25 patients who completed homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-related genetic testing, 20 carried pathogenic mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes. Twenty-four patients underwent SEE-FIM (Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbriated end) protocol sampling, and 4 were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). In contrast, none of the 80 patients who underwent OS due to other gynecologic conditions were diagnosed with malignancy. Conclusions Genetic counseling and timely RRSO are recommended for individuals carrying pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, as RRSO can effectively reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer. The timing of surgery will affect the final beneficiary populations

关键词

卵巢癌 / 遗传性乳腺癌卵巢癌家族史 / 降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术

Key words

ovarian cancer / hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family history / risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

引用本文

导出引用
倪丽, 王莹莹, 朱晨辰, . 卵巢癌高风险患者行预防性手术105例临床资料分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志. 2025, 41(7): 738-741 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025070115
NI Li, WANG Ying-ying, ZHU Chen-chen, et al. The Clinical analysis of 105 patients with high-risk ovarian cancer undergoing prophylactic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2025, 41(7): 738-741 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025070115
中图分类号: R711.75   

参考文献

[1]
中国老年保健协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会. 卵巢癌早期筛查中国专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(2):204-211. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025020113.
[2]
Stroot IAS, Brouwer J, Bart J, et al. High-Grade Serous Carcinoma at Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Asymptomatic Carriers of BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants: Prevalence and Clinical Factors[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(14):2523-2535. DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.01237.
[3]
中国医院协会妇产医院分会妇科肿瘤专业学组. 预防性输卵管切除术的中国专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(8):826-831. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021080110.
[4]
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, Bulten J, et al. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(17):1879-1891. DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.02016.
[5]
Sessa C, Balmaña J, Bober SL, et al. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes:ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline[J]. Ann Oncol, 2023, 34(1):33-47. DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.004.
[6]
Kim M, Kim YH, Kim YB, et al. Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2018, 61(5):542-552. DOI:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.5.542.
[7]
Barker VE, Vlachodimitropoulou E, O'Brien P, et al. Combined bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and cesarean delivery in BRCA1/2 alteration carriers :a case series[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 142(6):1500-1503. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005423.
[8]
Terry MB, Daly MB, Phillips KA, et al. Risk-reducing oophorectomy and breast cancer risk across the spectrum of familial risk[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2019, 111(3):331-334. DOI:10.1093/jnci/djy182.
[9]
蒋清秀, 王海霞, 傅春玲, 等. 卵巢癌预防性手术4例报告并文献复习[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(3):381-384. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024030126.
[10]
卢淮武, 霍楚莹, 黄纯娴, 等. 《2025 NCCN卵巢癌包括输卵管癌及原发性腹膜癌临床实践指南(第1版)》解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):436-444. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040113.
[11]
Steenbeek MP, Harmsen MG, Hoogerbrugge N, et al. Association of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy versus salpingo-oophorectomy with quality of life in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a nonrandomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(8):1203-1212. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1590.

基金

安徽省重点研发项目(2022e07020013)
国家自然科学基金(82172773)
国家自然科学基金(82303588)
安徽省高等学校科学研究项目(自然科学类)项目(2022AH051255)
安徽省自然科学基金青年基金(2208085QH252)
中国科学技术大学附属第一医院医疗领先技术引进项目(2020LXJS-05)

PDF(882 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/