A 34-year-old patient underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy, complicated by a profound episode of bradycardia and hypotension following intramyometrial infiltration of vasopressin (20 IU), promptly corrected with intravenous ephedrine (6 mg) and glycopyrrolate (200 µg). At extubation, pink frothy fluid was noted in the endotracheal tube; she was visibly distressed, desaturated to 89% in air and was coughing up pink stained fluid. Acute pulmonary oedema secondary to vasopressin was suspected. A tight-fitting oxygen mask (100%) with positive end expiratory pressure was applied and intravenous furosemide (20 mg) and diamorphine (4 mg, 1 mg increments) were administered to facilitate diuresis and oxygenation. Chest X-ray confirmed acute pulmonary oedema. Arterial blood gas demonstrated type 2 respiratory failure. Over 12 hours, the oxygen was weaned to 1 L/min. She demonstrated excellent diuresis. Troponin and brain-natriuretic peptide were elevated, but echocardiogram was normal. The cardiology diagnosis was vasopressin-induced coronary vasospasm, precipitating acute pulmonary oedema. She was discharged home on day 5.

The goal of this study was to examine the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of the use of a microsurgical temporary vascular clip system to facilitate the laparoscopic enucleation of very large intramural uterine fibroids.In this retrospective study, the surgical outcomes of 26 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with temporary uterine vessel clipping for very large (the largest measured diameter ≥ 9 cm) symptomatic intramural uterine fibroids in two tertiary referral hospitals between September 2017 and March 2020 were examined. Titan-made vascular clips (YASARGIL Aneurysm Clip System) were used to temporarily occlude the bilateral uterine arteries and utero-ovarian vessels. Main outcomes included operating time, blood loss, number of leiomyomas and weight, conversion rate, intra- and postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay.Twenty six patients were included. Dominant intramural uterine fibroid diameters were 9-22 cm. The general characteristics of the patients were similar. The mean surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss were 175.3 ± 32.7 (range 120-250) min and 241.1 ± 103 (range 100-450) ml, respectively. The median postoperative drop in hemoglobin was 0.89 ± 0.75 g/dL. No patient required blood transfusion. No procedure was converted to laparotomy. No major intra- or postoperative complication occurred.Laparoscopic myomectomy for very large intramural uterine fibroids can be performed safely and effectively, with less intraoperative blood loss, using vascular clips for temporary clamping of the bilateral uterine vessels.© 2022. The Author(s).

It is unclear whether transverse uterine incision is non-inferior to longitudinal incision during myomectomy with regard to bleeding. Our aim was to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incisions in myomectomy.A parallel randomized controlled single-blinded study in a university affiliated hospital, in the period between January 2017 and April 2018, in which 52 women candidates for abdominal myomectomy were randomized into transverse uterine incision or longitudinal uterine incision groups (26 in each group). Intraoperative blood loss (estimated directly by blood volume in suction bottle and linen towels and indirectly by difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit), operative time and postoperative fever were analyzed.No statistically significant difference was found between transverse and longitudinal incisions regarding intraoperative blood loss (389.7 ± 98.56 ml vs 485.04 ± 230.6 ml respectively, p value = 0.07), operative time (59.96 ± 16.78 min vs 66.58 ± 17.33 min respectively, p value = 0.18), and postoperative fever (4% vs 8.33%, p value = 0.6).Transverse uterine incision does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision and is a reasonable option during abdominal myomectomy.NCT03009812 at clinicaltrials.gov, registered January 2017.

Since 1990 laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has provided an alternative to laparotomy when intramural and subserous myomata are to be managed surgically. However, this technique is still the subject of debate. Based on their own experience together with data from the literature, the authors report on the situation today regarding the operative technique for LM and the risks and benefits of the technique as compared with myomectomy by laparotomy. The operative technique comprises four main phases: hysterotomy; enucleation; suture of the myomectomy site and extraction of the myoma. LM offers the possibility of a minimally invasive approach to treat medium-sized (<9 cm) subserous and intramural myomata by surgery when there are only two or three of them. When conducted by experienced surgeons, the risk of peri-operative complications is no higher using this technique. Use of the laparoscopic route could reduce the haemorrhagic risk associated with myomectomy. LM could reduce also the risk of post-operative adhesions as compared with laparotomy. Spontaneous uterine rupture seems to be rare after LM but further studies are needed before it can be said whether the strength of the hysterotomy scars after LM is equivalent to that obtained after laparotomy. The risk of recurrence seems to be higher after LM than after myomectomy performed by laparotomy.

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and techniques of laparoscopic myomectomy as treatment for symptomatic uterine myomas.Medline literature review and cross-reference of published data.Results from randomized trials and clinical series have shown that laparoscopic myomectomy provides the advantages of shorter hospitalization, faster recovery, fewer adhesions, and less blood loss than abdominal myomectomy when performed by skilled surgeons. Improvements in surgical instruments and techniques allows for safe removal and multilayer myometrial repair of multiple large intramural myomas. Randomized trials support the use of absorbable adhesion barriers to reduce adhesions, but there is no apparent benefit of presurgical use of GnRH agonists. Pregnancy outcomes have been good, and the risk of uterine rupture is very low when the myometrium is repaired appropriately.Advances in surgical instruments and techniques are expanding the role of laparoscopic myomectomy in well-selected individuals. Meticulous repair of the myometrium is essential for women considering pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy to minimize the risk of uterine rupture. Laparoscopic myomectomy is an appropriate alternative to abdominal myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization for some women.

To clarify the effects of uterine myometrial suture techniques at prior caesarean section on the incidence of pathologically diagnosed placenta accreta in placenta praevia with prior caesarean section (PPPC).

To determine preoperative and intraoperative factors that affect the healing pattern of a myomectomy uterine incision and to estimate the incidence and outcome of postmyomectomy hematoma demonstrated with sonography.This observational longitudinal prospective study followed the course of patients diagnosed with at least 1 leiomyomata. Each patent was scheduled for abdominal myomectomy. Preoperative assessments included sonographic measurement of the uterine volume as well as identification of the numbers and sites of the leiomyomata. Detailed operative notes were reported for every patient. Transvaginal sonography was performed for all cases on day 2, day 7, and at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of postoperative hematoma versus preoperative and postoperative factors that possibly affect uterine healing.We found a statistically significant reduction of the uterine volume on follow-up (P < 0.001) of the 169 women enrolled. Hematoma in the myomectomy bed was observed postoperatively in 40 (24%) 28 (17%) and 12 (7%) patients on day 2, day 7, and 1 month, respectively. A preoperative myoma size greater than 110 cm(3), the use of a tourniquet, and the experience of the surgeon were significantly correlated with formation of uterine scar hematomas.The postoperative sonographic diagnosis of wound hematoma may be used as an indicator of wound healing that is usually complete within 3 months. Use of a tourniquet is frequently associated with hematoma formation. Myomectomy should usually be performed by an experienced surgeon without a tourniquet, using microsurgical principles, especially when the sizes of the leiomyomata exceed 110 cm(3).Copyright 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

To evaluate the vascularity of the myometrium after laparoscopic myomectomy sutured by two different methods using contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Twenty-eight women who had symptomatic leiomyomas and underwent laparoscopic myomectomy between June 2013 and July 2014 were included in the present study. In the first half period, continuous sutures were used in 12 patients, and in the latter half period, single interrupted sutures were used in 16 patients. Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used 3 or 6 months after surgery to evaluate vascularity after laparoscopic myomectomy. We defined avascularity index as the percentage of avascular area after surgery to cross sectional area of myoma before surgery. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was applied to compare avascularity indeces in the two study groups.At 3 months after surgery, avascularity index in continuous sutures group was significantly higher than that in single interrupted sutures group (median 5.0 vs.1.2, p<0.001), suggesting a poorer vascular recovery of the myometrium sutured continuously.Simple interrupted suturing might be superior to continuous suturing in terms of vascularity evaluated using contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Our purpose was to measure the impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture at subsequent delivery.This is an observational cohort study of all women undergoing a trial of labor from 1988 to 2000 in a tertiary care center, after a single low transverse cesarean delivery. Factors most highly associated with uterine rupture were identified by using univariate regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for selected confounding variables.Of the 2142 women who met the study criteria, 1980 (92.4%) had maternal records and original operative reports reviewed. After adjustments were made for confounding variables, the odds ratio for uterine rupture in women with a single-layer closure was 3.95 (95% CI, 1.35-11.49).A single-layer closure of the previous lower segment incision was the most influential factor and was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of uterine rupture compared with a double-layer closure.

Study objective: The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the impact of laparoscopic myomectomy techniques on pregnancy outcomes, with a specific focus on the correlation between the type of suture used during the procedure and the incidence of uterine rupture. Additionally, the study aims to examine how the localization and size of myomas, key factors in laparoscopic myomectomy, may influence fertility outcomes. Data Sources: extensive searches were conducted using MDPI, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from 2008 to November 2023. Methods of Study Selection: The study involved women of reproductive age diagnosed with fibroids who underwent surgical removal of fibroids using either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The evaluation of pregnancy outcomes focused on indicators such as live birth rates, miscarriage rates, stillbirth rates, premature delivery rates, and cases of uterine rupture. Quality assessment was systematically performed by employing the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools, with the subsequent formulation of clinical recommendations that were meticulously graded in accordance with the robustness of the underlying evidence. Results: The pregnancy outcomes post-myoma treatment, as reflected in one of the presented tables, show a promising number of pregnancies and live births, but also indicate the potential risks of miscarriages and preterm births. The diversity in outcomes observed among various studies underscores the imperative for tailored patient care, as well as the necessity for additional research aimed at optimizing fertility and pregnancy outcomes following myoma treatment. Conclusion: This study offers insights into the criteria for patient selection and intraoperative methodologies specifically related to laparoscopic myomectomy. To enhance our understanding of the associations between fibroid characteristics (location, size) and reproductive outcomes, additional research is warranted, particularly through well-designed clinical trials.

Background: This work analyzes the feasibility and effectiveness of barbed suture during laparoscopic myomectomy. Methods: Eight works have been carefully examined for the meta-analysis from all papers published online until November 2017. Results: Barbed suture proved to be superior to traditional suture technique in blood loss in laparoscopic myomectomy (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] –0.650, 95% CI –1.420 to –0.119, p = 0.098, test for heterogenity p < 0.0001, I2 = 95.54%), Hb drop (SMD –1.452, 95% CI –3.590 to 0.687, p = 0.183, test for heterogenity p < 0.0001, I2 = 99.08%), suturing difficulty (SMD –0.638, 95% CI –0.935 to –0.342, p ≤ 0.001, test for heterogenity p = 0.25, I2 = 27.84%), suturing time (SMD –1.197, 95% CI –1.848 to –0.549, p ≤0.001, test for heterogenity p = 0.0001, I2 = 83.30%) and total operative time (SMD –0.687, 95% CI –0.804 to –0.569, p ≤ 0.001, test for heterogenity p = 0.292, I2 = 17.44%). Barbed suture demonstrated to be better in comparison with the control group even with regard to the length of hospitalization (SMD –0.278, 95% CI –0.543 to 0.012, p = 0.040, test for heterogenity p = 0.025, I2 = 61.85%), and to perioperative complications (SMD 0.708, 95% CI 0.503–0.996, p = 0.048, test for heterogenity p = 0.79, I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Barbed suture significantly facilitates laparoscopic myomectomy by reducing the total operative/suturing time, estimated blood loss/Hb drop, and reduction of perioperative complications.

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of postoperative adhesion by baseball running suture using barbed suture (BS) in laparoscopic myomectomy in comparison with sutures using an absorbable thread. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Two hundred fifteen patients who underwent second-look laparoscopy (SLL) 6 months after laparoscopic myomectomy at our hospital between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence, numbers, types, and extent of adhesions were evaluated according to the more comprehensive adhesion scoring method. Propensity score matching (PS) (1:1) between the groups was performed by using the diameter of the largest myoma, the number of enucleated myomas, and the type of adhesion barrier. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Running baseball sutures and running sutures were applied to 28 and 187 patients with unidirectional BS and absorbable thread, respectively, to close the incised serosal wounds enucleating largest myomas during laparoscopic myomectomy. After PS matching for the patients, surgical findings and the incidence of postoperative wound adhesions were compared between the groups, including 22 patients each. The surgical findings were similar between the groups, except for the total surgical duration and blood loss (medians), which were significantly shorter and lower in the BS group than in the absorbable thread group (70 vs. 100 min; <i>p</i> = 0.01, 50 vs. 100 mL; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Regarding findings of SLL, no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative wound adhesions were found between the groups (BS, 4/22 [18.2%] versus absorbable thread, 8/22 [36.4%]; <i>p</i> = 0.31). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our data indicated that the incidence of postoperative adhesion following the use of BS for wound closure in laparoscopic myomectomy was similar to that following the use of conventional suture.

Background: There is still concern regarding postoperative adhesion formation and adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes caused by barbed suture (BS) after myomectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative adhesion and pregnancy outcomes between conventional suture (CS) and BS after minimally invasive myomectomy (MIM) by robotic myomectomy (RM) or laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). Methods: The medical records of 94 women who had undergone MIM with CS and 97 who had undergone MIM with BS and achieved pregnancy were reviewed. Postoperative adhesion was evaluated following cesarean section. Results: The number of removed myomas was greater (5.3 ± 4.6 vs. 3.5 ± 3.1, p = 0.001) and the size of the largest myoma was larger (7.0 ± 2.2 vs. 5.8 ± 2.7 cm, p = 0.001) in the BS group relative to the CS group. A total of 98.9% of patients in the CS group and 45.4% in the BS group had undergone LM (p < 0.001), while the others underwent RM. There was no significant difference in the presence of postoperative adhesion at cesarean section between the BS and CS groups (45.5 vs. 43.7%, p = 0.095). Additionally, there were no intergroup differences in pregnancy complications such as preterm labor, placenta previa, accrete or abruption. Note also that in our logistic regression analysis, the suture type (BS or CS) was excluded from the independent risk factors regarding postoperative adhesion formation. Conclusions: Our data indicated that the incidence of postoperative adhesion after MIM with BS was similar when compared with CS. Also it seems that the suture type does not have a significant effect on pregnancy outcomes.

No large-scale databases exist of pregnancy outcomes and rate of uterine rupture for women after myomectomy, resulting in inconsistent antenatal counselling and decision-making regarding mode and timing of delivery. Standardising information collected at myomectomy may facilitate data collection, informing prenatal/ antenatal counselling.To determine clinician opinions regarding standardisation of myomectomy operation notes to allow comprehensive data input into a prospective database of pregnancy outcomes, toward an evidence-based approach to decision making regarding timing and mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies.A google forms survey was emailed to all consultant (attending-level) obstetricians and gynaecologists across 25 hospitals in London, Kent, Surrey, and Sussex (UK) between March and May 2022. To enhance response rates, two further email reminders were sent alongside in-person reminders from selected local unit representatives.Senior clinician opinion for characteristics necessary to collect at time of surgery to develop a widescale database of post myomectomy pregnancy outcomes.209/475 (44%) responses received; 95% (198/209) agreed with standardising operation notes. Criteria selected for inclusion included cavity breach (98%, 194/198), location (98%, 194/198), number of fibroids removed (93%, 185/198) and number of uterine incisions (96%, 190/198).Gynaecologists support standardising myomectomy operation notes to inform the development of prospective large-scale databases of pregnancy outcomes after myomectomy.Acquisition of clinician opinions on the development and content of a standardised myomectomy operation note to aid the development of a pregnancy-outcome database for women after myomectomy.

To compare adnexectomy by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) versus laparoscopy.

To describe the outcome of fertility preservation (FP) using vitrified oocytes in patients with endometriosis and to determine the impact of ovarian surgery.Retrospective observational study.University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center.Four hundred and eighty-five women with endometriosis who underwent FP from January 2007 to July 2018.Vitrification of metaphase II (MII) oocytes for future use.Oocyte survival rate and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR).Mean age at vitrification was 35.7 ± 3.7 years. The women undergoing operations were younger than the nonsurgical patients (33.4 ± 3.6 years vs. 36.7 ± 3.7 years). The survival rate and CLBR were 83.2% and 46.4%, respectively. The number of vitrified oocytes per cycle (6.2 ± 5.8) was higher for the nonsurgical patients compared with the unilateral (5.0 ± 4.5) or bilateral (4.5 ± 4.4) surgery groups, but was comparable among the surgical patients. The effect of age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.904; 95% CI, 0.858-0.952), number of oocytes (adjusted OR 1.050; 95% CI, 1.025-1.091), and survival (adjusted OR 1.011; 95% CI, 1.001-1.020) on the CLBR was confirmed. However, the effect of surgery was not observed (adjusted OR 1.142; 95% CI, 0.778-1.677). Nonetheless, the ovarian response (vitrified oocytes = 8.6 ± 6.9 vs. 5.1 ± 4.8) and CLBR (72.5% vs. 52.8%) were higher in young (≤35 years) nonsurgical patient versus the surgical patients; older women showed similar outcomes.Fertility preservation gives patients with endometriosis a valid treatment option to help them increase their reproductive chances. We suggest performing surgery after ovarian stimulation for FP in young women. In older women, an individualized treatment should be considered.Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

What prognostic factors relate to a high oocyte yield in fertility preservation for women affected by endometriosis?Observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary care university hospital between April 2015 and January 2019. Women who had undergone fertility preservation with ovarian stimulation for oocytes and embryo vitrification for endometriosis were included. Prognostic factors associated with the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation were analysed.A total of 146 women who had undergone 258 ovarian stimulation cycles were included; 82 (56.2%) had undergone more than one ovarian stimulation cycle; 72.6% had at least one endometrioma lesion; and 36.3% had previously undergone surgery for endometriosis. After adjustment by multiple linear regression, the factors that significantly reduced the number of oocytes retrieved were previous history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis (coefficient -1.08; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.15; P = 0.024); women's age (-0.21; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.01; P = 0.039); and total dose of gonadotrophin used (-0.01; 95% CI -0.01 to -0.00; P = 0.047). Anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and gravidity positively correlated with an increase in the number of oocytes retrieved (1.65; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.17; P < 0.001 and 3.30; 95% CI 0.91 to 5.68; P = 0.007, respectively) after the first ovarian stimulation cycle.A history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis was associated with significantly lower oocyte yields. Fertility preservation should be integrated into endometriosis management. Fertility preservation should ideally be made available to the patient before surgery.Copyright © 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging surgical procedure that combines the advantages of the vaginal approach with laparoscopic vision and instrumentation [1]. Shorter hospitalization and lower postoperative pain associated to vNOTES [2] may be explained by the advantages of this innovative surgical approach (such as absence of abdominal incisions, shorter operating time, lower insufflation pressure) [2;3]. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation allows to preserve reproductive and endocrine functions in young women with oncological disease at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) caused by gonadotoxic treatments [4]. Ovarian tissue biopsy for cryopreservation consists of a large biopsy of one or both ovaries [4] that is usually performed by laparoscopy. Then, the removed ovarian tissue is cryopreserved for the future transplant after cancer remission. Volume of ovarian biopsy ranges from 50% of the ovary for women at moderate risk of POI to 70 % or whole ovary for women at high risk [5]. Inclusion criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation are women aged less than 35 who cannot delay start of oncological treatments for follicles cryopreservation, with a moderate or high risk of POI and good chance of 5-year survival [6]. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation cannot be performed if tumor treatments include uterine irradiation or for tumors at risk of ovarian metastases (as in case of ovarian cancer, leukemia, neuroblastoma, Burkitt lymphoma) [7]. Despite widespread adoption of vNOTES in gynecology, ovarian biopsy for cryopreservation has never been performed using this route.Step-by-step explanation of the procedure with descriptive text and narrated video footage.Tertiary level referral academic center.A 27-years-old patient recently diagnosed with low grade follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma was referred to our center for ovarian tissue cryopreservation before chemotherapy. The patient included in this study gave informed consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online including social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, etc.) and other applicable sites. Due to the nature of the study, IRB approval was not required.Access to peritoneal cavity was created by a 3 cm posterior colpotomy. Peritoneum was then opened using cold scissors and temporarily fixed to the posterior vaginal wall. The Gelpoint Mini Advanced Access Platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA), with one 10 mm and two 5 mm trocars, was used as vNOTES port. The inner Alexis ring of the Gelpoint was inserted through the colpotomy into the pouch of Douglas. An hysterometer was placed into the uterine cavity to keep the uterus anteverted during the surgery. A pneumoperitoneum was created to a pressure of 8 mmHg and the operating table was tilted to 20° Trendelenburg position. A 10-mm rigid 30° camera was inserted in the inferior and larger trocar and both the ovaries were visualized. 70 % of the left ovary was removed with cold scissors, in order to minimize trauma on the surgical specimen. After removal of the Gelpoint cap, ovarian biopsy was immediately picked-up by the biologist of our fertility center. The ovary was coagulated with bipolar instrument. Hysterometer was then replaced by a uterine manipulator to perform tubal patency test and blue dye passage through both the salpinges was observed. Finally, the Alexis retractor and the stich on the posterior peritoneum were removed and the vagina was sutured using interrupted stiches. Total operative time was 25 minutes.Ovarian tissue biopsy for cryopreservation by vNOTES.No intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported and the patient was discharged after 24 hours from surgery.VNOTES may be a feasible alternative approach to laparoscopy for ovarian tissue cryopreservation: it allows an easy access to the ovaries and removal of different tissue volumes. Patients undergoing ovarian cryopreservation may benefit of vNOTES approach since a rapid post-operative recovery is crucial to start chemotherapy in a short time. As for other vNOTES surgical procedures, accurate selection of patients seems to be crucial for a successful ovarian tissue cryopreservation [8]. We think that inclusion and exclusion criteria reported for other gynecologic procedures performed through vNOTES may also be valid for ovarian tissue cryopreservation by vNOTES [9]. Women at high risk of pelvic adhesions (such as coexistent endometriosis, previous pelvic surgery or inflammatory pelvic disease), with elevated Body Mass Index or enlarged uterus as well as women with cervical, vaginal or uterine cancer cannot be considered for this approach since all these factors are associated to failure of vNOTES. On the other hand, women with no history of surgery, endometriosis and large myomas may benefit from vNOTES approach and these women represent most of patients who undergo ovarian tissue cryopreservation.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

To demonstrate how a transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) tubal reanastomosis is a novel route for tubal surgery. The surgical technique is a combination of traditional vaginal surgery with single-site surgical skills.The surgical technique is explained in a stepwise fashion with the use of surgical video footage. The video uses a surgical case to demonstrate the specific techniques necessary to perform a NOTES tubal reanastomosis.Teaching university.A 42-year-old female G2P2 with a history of tubal ligation 11 years before presentation requesting a tubal recanalization.Transvaginal NOTES tubal reanastomosis was initiated with a posterior colpotomy. A single-site gelport was placed. The fallopian tubes were hydrodissected, the blocked portion of each tube was removed, an epidural catheter was threaded through each lumen, and the two remaining segments of each tube were sutured together in an end-to-end fashion using single-site suturing skills.Transvaginal NOTES tubal reanastomosis as an alternative route for tubal reanastomosis.The bilateral fallopian tubes were recanalized with bilateral tubal patency. This was confirmed 8 weeks postoperatively with a three-dimensional sonohystogram, which showed patency of the bilateral fallopian tubes.The current preferred technique for reversal of a tubal sterilization is to perform a minimally invasive surgery with an end-to-end anastomosis. This gives the patient a 60%-90% intrauterine pregnancy rate postoperatively. NOTES has the benefits of a fast recovery, no abdominal incisional pain, and an extremely cosmetic outcome. Current research has shown a 0%-3.1% range for the risk of pelvic infection in transvaginal NOTES if prophylactic antibiotics are administered during the surgery. The NOTES tubal reanastomosis combines the traditional vaginal surgery technique of creating a posterior colpotomy with single-site surgical skills like suturing and knot tying. The surgery is completed through a single transvaginal port without an abdominal incision. In the hands of a skilled minimally invasive surgeon, transvaginal NOTES tubal reanastomosis is a feasible and alternative route for this procedure.Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

To describe a retroperitoneal transient occlusion of the uterine or internal iliac artery in conjunction with a high-risk evacuation of products of conception. The procedure was performed vaginally, minimally invasively, via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Description of the surgical technique using original video footage. This study was exempted from requiring hospital institutional review board approval.Teaching hospital.A 34-year-old woman (G8P3) with a medical history of 2 cesarean sections, 1 partial mole, and a missed abortion with 2.8 L of blood loss. The patient presented after 10 weeks of amenorrhea. Ultrasound revealed a large blood-filled niche in the cesarean section scar with a thin overlying myometrium. A partial mole was suspected as well as increased vascularization in the myometrium and enhanced myometrial vascularity with arterial flow velocities of 100 cm/s. A risk of heavy blood loss in conjunction with curettage was anticipated. The patient had a strong preference for a fertility-preserving treatment, and after informed consent, she opted for transient occlusion of the uterine arteries with subsequent suction evacuation of the molar pregnancy. The patient signed a consent form accepting the procedure. The patient included in this video provided consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online including social media, the journal website, and scientific literature websites. Institutional review board approval was not required in accordance with the IDEAL guidelines.A vaginal incision was made over the bladder, and the vaginal mucosa was dissected. The paravesical space was dissected over the arcus tendinous, and the pelvic retroperitoneal space was opened. A small (7 cm) GelPOINT V-Path (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California) was inserted into the obturator fossa and insufflated with 10 CO mm Hg. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used through the gel port. Under endoscopic view, dissection to the right obturator fossa and iliac vessels was made, and the internal iliac artery was identified. A removable clip was placed on the origin of the right uterine artery. The same procedure was performed on the left side where the internal iliac artery was clipped. Different vessels were clipped to demonstrate and investigate the feasibility of both approaches. Both vessels were equally accessible. Care should be taken not to injure the uterine vein at the time of clipping. Dilation and evacuation was performed under transanal ultrasound surveillance. When hemostatic control was assured, first, the right clip was removed from the iliac artery. Hemostatic control was ensured, and after 10 minutes, the second clip on the left iliac artery was removed. The GelPOINT was removed, and the vaginal incision was sutured. The patient bled in total 500 mL.Not applicable.The patient recovered swiftly without complications. Pathology confirmed a partial molar pregnancy.Uterine or internal iliac artery ligation can be lifesaving in situations with massive bleeding from the uterus. Current minimally invasive approaches are laparoscopic vessel ligation and, more commonly, uterine artery embolization, which has unclear impact on fertility and has shown an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, miscarriage, and prematurity. As the patient was undergoing a vaginal evacuation of pregnancy, a vaginal and retroperitoneal approach of artery ligation was deemed least invasive. In patients with fertility-preserving wishes, care should to be taken to avoid as much trauma as possible to the endometrium. Optimized blood control, and a shorter duration of using a curette, may potentially reduce the risk of endometrial damage. We present a novel minimally invasive approach via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-retroperitoneal transient occlusion of the internal iliac or uterine artery. The whole procedure can be performed by the operating gynecologist, and the occlusion is transient and can be reversed in a stepwise controlled manner.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

<b><i>Study Objective:</i></b> Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimal invasive surgical technique allowing a variety of gynecological procedures. The current literature describes improved patient comfort, improved better cosmetic results, and reduced operation time. This is a first study to assess pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. <b><i>Design/Participants/Materials/Setting/Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective observational cohort study including 125 patients under 43 years that underwent fertility-preserving vNOTES over a 5-year period (2014–2019). The gynecological surgical procedures included were vNOTES myomectomy, vNOTES salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, vNOTES unilateral adnexectomy, and vNOTES cystectomy. A total of 26 pregnancies in 21 cases were observed, with deliveries between 2015 and 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Retrospective analysis in this patient group showed that 18 pregnancies were diagnosed within 1 year after vNOTES (85.7%). Mean interval between surgery and pregnancy was 6 months. Fertility treatment was performed in 28.6%. In the 26 observed pregnancies, no vNOTES-related complications were observed and delivery was at term in all cases. Mode of delivery was a vaginal delivery in twenty cases (76.9% of total) of which 2 cases vacuum assisted (7.7%) and a Caesarean section in 6 cases (23.1% of total). Two cases of trial of labor after Caesarean are described after vNOTES surgery, both ended in an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. In case of vaginal delivery, the perineum was intact in 15%, a mediolateral episiotomy was performed in 50 and 35% a grade 1–2 perineal rupture was described. No grade 3–4 perineal ruptures are described. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> A limitation of this study is the retrospective design which does not correct for confounding factors. Further larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these data. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This is the first study describing pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. vNOTES did not affect the mode of delivery or cause pregnancy-related complications. vNOTES did not increase the risk of extensive perineal tears during vaginal delivery. These preliminary data show no adverse events when vNOTES is performed in women of reproductive age. Posterior colpotomy as performed in all vNOTES procedures is by itself not an indication for an elective Caesarean section.

The aim was to investigate the outcome of vaginal delivery of full-term pregnancies in patients after transvaginal-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) treatment for gynecological disorders.

To describe a novel, minimally invasive technique for performing myomectomy, a fertility-sparing procedure.This technique was developed based on similar techniques for other surgeries that showed a benefit. Liu et al. (1) described vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for myomectomy, in which a 6-cm myoma was resected transvaginally. An anterior colpotomy was made, and single-site surgical skills were used to perform the entire myomectomy without an abdominal incision and with minimal blood loss (1). Another study showed that this technique was also feasible in 8 patients with type 3-7 myomas, and the patients were discharged within a day (2). Robotic vNOTES surgery has been performed for various gynecologic procedures, including hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and the resection of endometriosis (3-6). One study showed that robotic vNOTES was a viable alternative to traditional vNOTES for hysterectomy, with no differences in operative time, the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain levels, or conversions (3). This study in fact proposed that robotic vNOTES was beneficial because of the opportunity to use wristed instruments to increase an otherwise limited range of motion. Another study showed that if surgeons already have significant experience with laparoscopic single-site and abdominal robotic surgeries, only 10 cases of robotic vNOTES and 10-20 port placements with robotic docking are needed to become proficient in robotic vNOTES (7). Another study showed that robotic vNOTES was a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of endometriosis with hysterectomy and the resection of endometriosis, which may be technically challenging because of distorted anatomy or scar tissue due to endometriosis (4). This video demonstrates a robotic vNOTES for myomectomy, a novel, minimally invasive technique for performing myomectomy. Vaginal surgery is the preferred route for hysterectomy compared with other techniques, and this parallel can also be made for other gynecologic procedures, including myomectomy (8). The vaginal approach is preferred for hysterectomy because it is associated with shorter hospital stays and operative time as well as faster recovery. Given these factors, the vaginal approach is preferred over the more traditional umbilical or abdominal laparoscopy. However, visualization and fine movement can be difficult in vaginal surgery, given the lack of space. Robotic techniques in place of traditional or vaginal laparoscopy do not require the surgeon to have a large amount of space to make fine movements because the camera and small robotic instruments are docked close to the tissue. This allows for precision while suturing and performing more layers in the myometrium after myomectomy. This is more difficult to achieve with traditional umbilical laparoscopy and may potentially reduce the risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies. Given the advantages of the robotic and vaginal approaches, the robotic vNOTES route was pursued for this procedure because it combines the benefits of robotic and vaginal surgeries and can be considered as a feasible alternative to open, vaginal, or laparoscopic techniques.Academic-center hospital.A 28-year-old presented with heavy periods and pelvic pain. Imaging showed a large, 8-cm posterior fibroid, and the patient strongly desired a fertility-sparing approach.Robotic vNOTES for myomectomy for the 8-cm posterior uterine fibroid.Feasibility and safety of using this technique for myomectomy.Robotic vNOTES is a feasible option for performing minimally invasive myomectomy. In this technique, a posterior horizontal colpotomy was made and a gel port was placed through the incision. The DaVinci Robot was docked, and myomectomy was performed using single-incision surgical techniques. The uterine serosa was closed with the V-Loc suture, and an interceed adhesion barrier was placed over the incision. The surgeon should take care to notice that the entire surgery is essentially performed "upside down" compared with the traditional abdominal laparoscopic approach. With this change in perspective, the surgeon should have a very good understanding of the vaginal anatomy and the expected location of the uterine artery, ureter, and rectum to avoid any damage to surrounding structures (the uterus) or increased blood loss. The fibroid was morcellated out of the vagina using The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction technique, and the posterior colpotomy was closed (9). The patient was discharged for home on the same day, with minimal blood loss. A prelabor cesarean section was recommended for all future pregnancies to reduce the risk of uterine rupture. The rate of uterine rupture after myomectomy is approximately 0.6% (10). However, the rate of uterine rupture after classical cesarean section is approximately 1%-12% (11). Given that the incision made was similar to the classical incision, except on the posterior uterus, prelabor cesarean section was recommended, although the uterine cavity was not entered.In this video, we demonstrate a myomectomy performed using the robotic vNOTES technique. The traditional vNOTES technique for myomectomy has been previously described (1); however, this technique can be very burdensome for suturing and does not allow for precision, and performing multiple layers is challenging. However, the robotic vNOTES approach solves this issue and can allow the surgeon to perform very precise suturing. While choosing the ideal patient for this procedure, the preoperative considerations include the desire for future fertility, the size and location of the fibroid, ideally 1 large posterior fibroid, and adequate space for vaginal port placement. This technique combines the advantages of both vaginal and robotic surgeries while maintaining low blood loss, and patients may be discharged for home on the same day.Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.