Acta Metallurgica Sinica

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of controlled attenuation parameters in evaluation of liver steatosis using FibroTouch and FibroScan.

ZHU Meng-feiLIU JingWANG JieCHENG Gong-yingLOU Guo-qingSHI Jun-ping   

  1. The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 310015,China
  • Online:2014-06-01 Published:2014-06-03

FibroTouch及FibroScan实施受控衰减参数评价肝细胞脂肪变与肝脏病理比较分析

朱梦飞刘静王洁陈公英娄国强施军平   

  1. 作者单位:杭州师范大学附属医院,杭州 310015
  • 通讯作者: 施军平
  • 基金资助:

    杭州市科技计划项目(20110833B07);杭州市卫生局项目(2011Z006)

Abstract:

Abstract:Objective To compare the controlled attenuation parameters (CAP) measurement of liver steatosis using FibroTouch and FibroScan. Methods Patients with non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were included from July to October 2013 and liver biopsy was completed on these patients.They were examined to collect the CAP values by FibroTouch and FibroScan-502 respectively.Results A total of 41 patients with CHB and 20 patients with NAFLD were recruited.CAP values of FibroScan and FibroTouch are positively correlated with BMI (r=0.42,0.61;P=0.02,0.000) and degree of liver steatosis (r=0.54,0.56;P=0.001,0.001).CAP values of 33 patients with >5% fat degeneration of liver cells were significantly higher than those of patients with no fat degeneration (FibroTouch[252.18±41.23]dB/m vs [220.68±54.75]dB/m,P=0.04;FibroScan[291.61±56.80]B/m vs [215.75±45.11]dB/m,P=0.000).CAP values of patients with liver steatosis <30% were significantly lower than those of patients with liver steatosis >60% by FibroScan ([258.73±52.54]dB/m vs [327.42±49.08]dB/m,P=0.04).But there were no differences in CAP values among patients with liver steatosis less than 30%,between 30%-60%,and more than 60%.Conclusion CAP values by FibroTouch and FibroScan are positively correlated with body mass and degree of liver steatosis.CAP value is a good and noninvasive index to evaluate degree of liver steatosis.

Key words: FibroTouch, FibroScan, controlled attenuation parameters, liver steatosis, liver biopsy

摘要:

目的 评价瞬时弹性超声诊断仪FibroTouch、FibroScan实施受控衰减参数(CAP)无创定量诊断脂肪肝与肝脏穿刺病理结果的对比及相关分析。方法 对2013年7-10月在杭州师范大学附属医院对病理确诊的非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者及慢性乙型肝炎患者(CHB)应用FibroTouch、FibroScan-502机型测定肝脏脂肪含量(CAP值)。结果 41例CHB患者与20例NAFLD患者同时接受FibroTouch、FibroScan检查,测定的CAP与患者体质量指数(BMI,r分别为0.42,0.61;P分别为0.02,0.000)及肝细胞脂肪变呈正相关(r分别为0.54,0.56;P均<0.001);33例病理诊断肝细胞脂肪变>5%的患者FibroTouch与FibroScan测定的CAP值均显著高于28例无脂肪变的CAP值[FibroTouch:(252.18±41.23)dB/m比(220.68±54.75)dB/m,P=0.04;FibroScan:(291.61±56.80)dB/m比(215.75±45.11)dB/m,P=0.000];FibroScan测定肝细胞脂肪变<30%患者的CAP值、肝细胞脂肪变30%~60%患者的CAP值、>60%脂肪变组的CAP值间存在差异(F=6.82,P=0.004),且肝细胞脂肪变<30%患者的CAP值低于>60%脂肪变组的CAP值[(258.73±52.54)dB/m比(327.42±49.08)dB/m,P=0.04]。但FibroTouch对上述3组患者测定的CAP值间差异无统计学意义(F=2.30,P=0.12)。结论 FibroTouch与FibroScan测定的CAP值均能评价肝细胞脂肪变,CAP值的高低与患者的BMI大小、肝病理脂肪变严重程度呈正相关。FibroScan测定的CAP值能区分轻度与重度的脂肪变,而FibroTouch测定的CAP值不能区分,可能与本组实验病例过少有关,有待进一步研究。

关键词: 瞬时弹性超声诊断仪, 受控衰减参数, 病理, 肝细胞脂肪变

CLC Number: